
5 C The fees from the review engagement are likely to be very lucrative, so there is a risk that YHT & Co will not seek adjustments during the external audit process for fear of upsetting the Board of BJM and losing the review engagement work.
The provision of non-audit services to unlisted audit clients is not specifically prohibited. While YHT & Co should be alert to self-review threats, in this case it seems unlikely: the scenario states that the review engagement does not include the provision of accounting advice or the preparation of figures in the financial statements. A firm is not required to turn down work when a 15% limit is exceeded.
Where fee income from a listed audit client is expected to exceed 15% of the audit firm's total fee
revenue, this fact should be disclosed to those charged with governance and a separate review may be required (ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct: para. 290.217). However, the 15% fee cap is not a major concern to YHT in this instance because BJM is unlisted.
