[单选题]5 The audit partner has told you that the independence threats arising from YHT & Co performing the review engagement should be monitored carefully.
Which of the following is likely to cause the audit partner most concern?

A
According to the ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct, YHT & Co is prohibited from providing other assurance services to an audit client.
B
The review engagement is likely to give rise to a self-review threat, as the outcomes of the review could form the basis of the financial statements which the audit team will audit.
C
The lucrative nature of the review engagement may make the external audit team less inclined to require management to make adjustments or to issue a modified audit opinion, for fear of losing the review engagement.
D
If the new review engagement causes YHT & Co's fee income from BJM to exceed 15% of the firm's total fees, the ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct states that the new engagement must be turned down.
正确答案:C
题目解析

5 C The fees from the review engagement are likely to be very lucrative, so there is a risk that YHT & Co will not seek adjustments during the external audit process for fear of upsetting the Board of BJM and losing the review engagement work.

The provision of non-audit services to unlisted audit clients is not specifically prohibited. While YHT & Co should be alert to self-review threats, in this case it seems unlikely: the scenario states that the review engagement does not include the provision of accounting advice or the preparation of figures in the financial statements. A firm is not required to turn down work when a 15% limit is exceeded.

Where fee income from a listed audit client is expected to exceed 15% of the audit firm's total fee

revenue, this fact should be disclosed to those charged with governance and a separate review may be required (ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct: para. 290.217). However, the 15% fee cap is not a major concern to YHT in this instance because BJM is unlisted.

 

 

扫描二维码
免费搜题、免费刷题、免费查看解析